The Fed and the Economy: “Don’t Shoot Until You See the Whites of Their Eyes”

The Federal Reserve has started to highlight “forward guidance” as a way to keep interest rates lower for longer – and get the exhausted hamster off the treadmill of quantitative easing. We still think tapering remains farther off than most investors expect.

November 20, 2013    |    By Scott Minerd

Global CIO Commentary by Scott Minerd

On Tuesday evening at the National Economists Club, Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke stressed the importance of communication and the power of signals from the Fed to move financial markets. As if to underscore his message, today’s release of the Oct. 29-30 Fed minutes triggered more market speculation about whether the Fed might taper its asset purchases sooner rather than later. One thing is clear, distilling Fed policy into an understandable message is easier said than done. My view is that the Fed is highly sensitive to economic data and that stable employment growth and economic momentum remain elusive, suggesting that tapering remains farther off than most investors expect. We cannot keep looking to the future for the economic growth needed to slow quantitative easing today. In June, when Dr. Bernanke raised the prospect of reducing accommodation, interest rates spiked violently and housing activity began to stall. So, the new math at the Fed seems to revolve around ending quantitative easing without another spike in interest rates. The equation of the day would substitute stronger guidance about the future path of interest rates (“forward guidance”) for asset purchases. In either case, the likely incoming Fed Chairman Janet Yellen has made clear that she needs concrete signals that the economy is back on track before she will consider tapering. Dr. Yellen has essentially told markets, let’s not fool ourselves – let’s wait until we actually see the whites of the expansion’s eyes. The bottom line is that low rates should persist for at least another two or three years. It is also very likely that in the coming months the Fed will commit to keeping short-term rates lower for longer, so it can slow the wheel enough to allow the hamster to get off the endless treadmill of asset purchases.

Ultra-Low Fed Funds To Continue Under Yellen

An April 2012 speech by Dr. Janet Yellen, set to be the next chairman of the Federal Reserve, may provide clues for the Federal Open Market Committee’s (FOMC) future monetary policy stance. In the speech, she introduced three methods to project the optimal federal funds rate, and suggested that a revised Taylor Rule and the “optimal control” approach were her preferred methods. Based on FOMC projections from September, the median rate forecast suggests a first interest rate hike in mid-2015, later than what would be appropriate under the original and revised Taylor Rule. The Fed’s rate forecast implies that the optimal control method, which suggests a first rate hike in early 2016, is exerting growing influence on FOMC members’ views.



Source: Bloomberg, Goldman Sachs, Guggenheim Investments. Data as of 10/31/2013. *Note: The original Taylor Rule measures the optimal interest rate in response to changes in inflation, output, and other economic conditions. The revised Taylor Rule uses the same formula, but increases the values of parameters for converting the unemployment gap into the output gap. The optimal control method chooses the interest rate to minimize the loss function of unemployment and inflation, which is structurally different than the Taylor Rule. Goldman Sachs derived a simplified approach to simulate the optimal control path and we reproduced their conclusions here. Projections are based on FOMC’s median forecast for key economic variables through 2016.

Economic Data Releases

Retail Sales Strong in October, Other Data Weak

  • Retail sales rose more than expected in October, growing 0.4% after remaining unchanged in September. Nine of 13 categories showed increased sales.
  • Existing home sales dropped to an annualized rate of 5.1 million in October, a 3.2% decrease and the lowest since June.
  • Industrial production decreased 0.1% in October after rising the previous two months.
  • The Empire Manufacturing index dropped to -2.21 in November, the fourth consecutive decrease and the lowest level since January.
  • The NAHB housing market index was unchanged in November at 54.
  • Mortgage applications fell 2.3% for the week ended November 15th, but purchase applications increased.
  • The CPI ticked down 0.1% in October, and the year-over-year reading fell to 1.0%, the lowest in four years.
  • Wholesale inventories rose for a third straight month in September, up 0.4%.

Expectations for Improved Growth in Europe, Japanese Exports Jump

  • Euro zone CPI was unchanged in the October final estimate, remaining at a four-year low of 0.7%.
  • The euro zone trade surplus widened from €6.9 billion to €13.1 billion in September.
  • The euro zone ZEW survey increased to 60.2 in November, the highest since March 2006.
  • The ZEW survey of investor expectations in Germany rose to 54.6 in November, a four-year high.
  • Japanese exports accelerated to 18.6% year-over-year growth in October, the fastest since July 2010 and the fourth consecutive month of faster growth.


September 17, 2019

Forecasting the Next Recession: Will Rate Cuts Be Enough?

History shows that once our recession forecast model reaches current levels, aggressive policy can delay recession, but not avoid it.

August 22, 2019

Looking Past the Liquidity-Driven Rally

Credit spreads could get tighter in this liquidity-driven rally, but history has shown that the potential for widening from here is much greater.

July 29, 2019

The Fed's Sugar High

Rational immigration policy, not rate cuts, is the way to avoid recession.


Third Quarter 2019 Fixed-Income Outlook 

Third Quarter 2019 Fixed-Income Outlook

Portfolio Manager Adam Bloch and Matt Bush, a Director in the Macroeconomic and Investment Research Group, share insights from the third quarter 2019 Fixed-Income Outlook.

Core Fixed-Income Conundrum 

Solving the Core Conundrum

Anne Walsh, Chief Investment Officer for Fixed Income, shares insights on the fixed-income market and explains the Guggenheim approach to solving the Core Conundrum.

Read a prospectus and summary prospectus (if available) carefully before investing. It contains the investment objective, risks charges, expenses and the other information, which should be considered carefully before investing. To obtain a prospectus and summary prospectus (if available) click here or call 800.820.0888.

Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal.

Guggenheim Investments represents the following affiliated investment management businesses of Guggenheim Partners, LLC: Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC, Security Investors, LLC, Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC, Guggenheim Funds Distributors, LLC, GS GAMMA Advisors, LLC, Guggenheim Partners Europe Limited and Guggenheim Partners India Management. Securities offered through Guggenheim Funds Distributors, LLC, an affiliate of Guggenheim, SI, GFIA and GPIM.

© Guggenheim Investments. All rights reserved.

Research our firm with FINRA Broker Check.

• Not FDIC Insured • No Bank Guarantee • May Lose Value

This website is directed to and intended for use by citizens or residents of the United States of America only. The material provided on this website is not intended as a recommendation or as investment advice of any kind, including in connection with rollovers, transfers, and distributions. Such material is not provided in a fiduciary capacity, may not be relied upon for or in connection with the making of investment decisions, and does not constitute a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities. All content has been provided for informational or educational purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be construed as legal or tax advice and/or a legal opinion. Always consult a financial, tax and/or legal professional regarding your specific situation. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal.